OpenEd@UCL

‘If RLUK academic librarians agree that digital strategies are in need of a (critical) decolonising process, powerful institutional change can occur, despite the intersection of education and technology with unethical values.’ – A Critical Discourse

LoadingLoading previews...
Smith, Naomi 21-22.pdf
Text Creative Commons: Attribution-Share Alike 4.0
Download (803kB)
Attribution: ‘If RLUK academic librarians agree that digital strategies are in need of a (critical) decolonising process, powerful institutional change can occur, despite the intersection of education and technology with unethical values.’ – A Critical Discourse is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
    Smith, Naomi 21-22.pdf
    Smith, Naomi 21-22.pdf
    1 file in this resource

    ‘If RLUK academic librarians agree that digital strategies are in need of a (critical) decolonising process, powerful institutional change can occur, despite the intersection of education and technology with unethical values.’ – A Critical Discourse

    The purpose of this paper is a call of action for Academic librarians to review their approach and definition of ‘Digital Inequality’. The paper argues for new definitions to be developed by Academic Libraries, within their digital policies, which incorporate Critical theory based, intersectional, non - techno deterministic approaches. Academic librarians, especially those from the Global North must recognise the role Higher Education and Librarians have in upholding digital inequalities through their current lack of critical awareness and critical approaches. Only by asking ourselves difficult questions about what we understand about ourselves and the institutions we work in can radical digital equity truly begin

    Advice for reuse

    CC BY-SA 4.0

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Toolbox

    There are no actions available for this resource.